Picked by QualifierEvidence by Numbers

The buyer

Versace

brand · X @Versace (verified) · from the Versace × Bad Bunny thesis →

Why this side

Versace is the side to approach because it is a brand with a verified public contact route, and the facts suggest their other audience already likes it strongly. Bad Bunny is kept as evidence only because he is an individual artist whose public contact route is not verified yet, even though the facts suggest their other audience already likes it strongly.

never contactedBad Bunny (artist) is evidence only.

0.90
Bad Bunny fans → Versace
0.90
Versace fans → Bad Bunny
Pair score0.85PITCH

Who the audience is

Versace audience by age

■ over-indexes (right) · ■ under-indexes (left), relative to Qloo's baseline

Under 25+0.05
25–29-0.01
30–34+0.19
35–44+0.16
45–54-0.54
55+-0.59

Where

Cities where both audiences are strong

◎ San Juan◎ Ponce◎ Miami◎ El Paso

Versace's strongest US cities

MiamiNew YorkLos AngelesLas VegasSan JuanEl PasoWashington DCOrlando

Taste the two audiences share

fashionfriendshiplovefemale protagonistfriendmodel

Three more partners Qloo found for Versace

The pitch sells Qloo's breadth, not one deal. Affinity out = Versace fans → partner; back = partner fans → Versace.

Charli XCXartist
out 0.94back 0.92

Outreach

9 found, 4 verified. Only verified contacts get a message. See the plan →

Qloo taste data (hackathon API). Aggregate audience affinity; not causal. Picked by the Qualifier and assembled by the Numbers agent with no human review.