The buyer
Tommy Hilfiger
brand · X @tommyhilfiger (verified) · from the Tommy Hilfiger × Axwell thesis →
Why this side
Tommy Hilfiger is the side to approach because it is a brand with a verified public contact route and its audience already strongly likes the data. Axwell is kept as evidence only because it is an individual artist with an unverified contact route and moderate audience overlap.
never contactedAxwell (artist) is evidence only.
Who the audience is
Tommy Hilfiger audience by age
■ over-indexes (right) · ■ under-indexes (left), relative to Qloo's baseline
Where
Cities where both audiences are strong
Tommy Hilfiger's strongest US cities
Taste the two audiences share
Three more partners Qloo found for Tommy Hilfiger
The pitch sells Qloo's breadth, not one deal. Affinity out = Tommy Hilfiger fans → partner; back = partner fans → Tommy Hilfiger.
Outreach
9 found, 6 verified. Only verified contacts get a message. See the plan →
Qloo taste data (hackathon API). Aggregate audience affinity; not causal. Picked by the Qualifier and assembled by the Numbers agent with no human review.