Picked by QualifierEvidence by Numbers

The buyer

Tiffany & Co.

brand · X @TiffanyAndCo (verified) · from the Tiffany & Co. × Charli XCX thesis →

Why this side

Tiffany & Co. is the right choice to approach because it is a brand that buys audience data and has a verified public contact route. Charli XCX is kept as evidence only because she is an individual artist whose contact route is not verified yet.

never contactedCharli XCX (artist) is evidence only.

0.91
Charli XCX fans → Tiffany & Co.
0.89
Tiffany & Co. fans → Charli XCX
Pair score0.85PITCH

Who the audience is

Tiffany & Co. audience by age

■ over-indexes (right) · ■ under-indexes (left), relative to Qloo's baseline

Under 25-0.01
25–29-0.03
30–34+0.16
35–44+0.20
45–54-0.55
55+-0.62

Where

Cities where both audiences are strong

◎ New York◎ Los Angeles◎ Buffalo◎ Brooklyn◎ Las Vegas◎ Washington DC◎ Orlando

Tiffany & Co.'s strongest US cities

New YorkMiamiBuffaloLas VegasOrlandoLos AngelesBrooklynWashington DC

Taste the two audiences share

female protagonistfriendshipfriendpop

Three more partners Qloo found for Tiffany & Co.

The pitch sells Qloo's breadth, not one deal. Affinity out = Tiffany & Co. fans → partner; back = partner fans → Tiffany & Co..

FlowersTV show
out 0.88back 0.88
Emily in ParisTV show
out 0.00back 0.00

Outreach

8 found, 7 verified. Only verified contacts get a message. See the plan →

Qloo taste data (hackathon API). Aggregate audience affinity; not causal. Picked by the Qualifier and assembled by the Numbers agent with no human review.