Picked by QualifierEvidence by Numbers

The buyer

Rowse Beauty

brand · from the Rowse Beauty × Julia Jacklin thesis →

Why this side

Rowse Beauty is the chosen side to approach because it is a brand that buys audience data. Julia Jacklin is kept as evidence only because she is an individual artist whose buyer would be a label or management.

never contactedJulia Jacklin (artist) is evidence only.

0.92
Julia Jacklin fans → Rowse Beauty
0.89
Rowse Beauty fans → Julia Jacklin
Pair score0.86PITCH

Who the audience is

Rowse Beauty audience by age

■ over-indexes (right) · ■ under-indexes (left), relative to Qloo's baseline

Under 25-0.10
25–29+0.52
30–34-0.87
35–44+0.09
45–54-0.51
55+-0.61

Where

Cities where both audiences are strong

◎ San Francisco◎ New York

Rowse Beauty's strongest US cities

New YorkLos AngelesSan FranciscoMiamiBrooklyn

Taste the two audiences share

musicianfeminismfriendshipintrospectiveartisticindie popintimateintrospectiveintrospectiveindie rock

Three more partners Qloo found for Rowse Beauty

The pitch sells Qloo's breadth, not one deal. Affinity out = Rowse Beauty fans → partner; back = partner fans → Rowse Beauty.

Tyler Lyleartist
out 0.00back 0.00

Outreach

3 found, 1 verified. Only verified contacts get a message. See the plan →

Qloo taste data (hackathon API). Aggregate audience affinity; not causal. Picked by the Qualifier and assembled by the Numbers agent with no human review.