Picked by QualifierEvidence by Numbers

The buyer

Kosas

brand · from the Kosas × Ambar Lucid thesis →

Why this side

Kosas is the side to approach because it is a brand that buys audience data, whereas Ambar Lucid is an individual artist whose label or management would be the actual buyer. Ambar Lucid is kept as evidence only because the artist's strong audience appeal demonstrates market demand for Qloo taste data.

never contactedAmbar Lucid (artist) is evidence only.

0.90
Ambar Lucid fans → Kosas
0.85
Kosas fans → Ambar Lucid
Pair score0.89PITCH

Who the audience is

Kosas audience by age

■ over-indexes (right) · ■ under-indexes (left), relative to Qloo's baseline

Under 25+0.61
25–29+0.21
30–34+0.24
35–44+0.14
45–54-0.53
55+-0.56

Where

Cities where both audiences are strong

◎ Los Angeles◎ Long Beach◎ San Diego◎ San Francisco◎ Chicago◎ New York◎ Anaheim◎ Austin

Kosas's strongest US cities

Los AngelesSan FranciscoNew YorkSan DiegoPortlandSeattleLong BeachAnaheim

Taste the two audiences share

friendshipfemale protagonistfriendlovemusicianbased on novelfamily relationships21st centuryhealth & beautynew york cityfeminismactor

Three more partners Qloo found for Kosas

The pitch sells Qloo's breadth, not one deal. Affinity out = Kosas fans → partner; back = partner fans → Kosas.

High FidelityTV show
out 0.95back 0.78
The Dreamsideartist
out 0.95back 0.72
Bloodflowerzartist
out 0.95back 0.68

Outreach

8 found, 4 verified. Only verified contacts get a message. See the plan →

Qloo taste data (hackathon API). Aggregate audience affinity; not causal. Picked by the Qualifier and assembled by the Numbers agent with no human review.