Picked by QualifierEvidence by Numbers

The buyer

Kooding

brand · X @kooding (review) · from the Kooding × Jennie thesis →

Why this side

Kooding is the correct side to approach because it is a brand or studio, which is the kind of business that directly buys audience data. Jennie is kept as evidence only because she is an individual artist whose purchase would go through a label or management.

never contactedJennie (artist) is evidence only.

0.95
Jennie fans → Kooding
0.98
Kooding fans → Jennie
Pair score0.86PITCH

Who the audience is

Kooding audience by age

■ over-indexes (right) · ■ under-indexes (left), relative to Qloo's baseline

Under 25+0.50
25–29-0.45
30–34+0.74
35–44-0.85
45–54+0.62
55+-0.83

Where

Cities where both audiences are strong

◎ Honolulu◎ San Francisco◎ Los Angeles◎ New York◎ Buffalo◎ Seattle◎ San Jose◎ Anaheim

Kooding's strongest US cities

Los AngelesNew YorkSan FranciscoAnaheimLas VegasSan JoseSeattleHonolulu

Taste the two audiences share

health & beautyactorkdramak popkorean dramalovekpopsouth koreakorea

Three more partners Qloo found for Kooding

The pitch sells Qloo's breadth, not one deal. Affinity out = Kooding fans → partner; back = partner fans → Kooding.

Outreach

The Contact finder has not reached this account yet. It works one account per run, every hour.

Qloo taste data (hackathon API). Aggregate audience affinity; not causal. Picked by the Qualifier and assembled by the Numbers agent with no human review.