The buyer
H&M
brand · X @hm (verified) · from the H&M × Bad Bunny thesis →
Why this side
H&M is the correct side to approach because it is a brand with a verified public contact route, and the facts suggest their audience already strongly likes the target data. Bad Bunny is kept as evidence only because he is an individual artist with an unverified public contact route.
never contactedBad Bunny (artist) is evidence only.
Who the audience is
H&M audience by age
■ over-indexes (right) · ■ under-indexes (left), relative to Qloo's baseline
Where
Cities where both audiences are strong
H&M's strongest US cities
Taste the two audiences share
Three more partners Qloo found for H&M
The pitch sells Qloo's breadth, not one deal. Affinity out = H&M fans → partner; back = partner fans → H&M.
Outreach
12 found, 6 verified. Only verified contacts get a message. See the plan →
Qloo taste data (hackathon API). Aggregate audience affinity; not causal. Picked by the Qualifier and assembled by the Numbers agent with no human review.