Picked by QualifierEvidence by Numbers

The buyer

Forever 21

brand · X @forever21 (verified) · from the Forever 21 × Charli XCX thesis →

Why this side

Forever 21 is the side to approach because it is a brand with a verified public contact route, and the facts suggest its audience already strongly likes Qloo's data. Charli XCX is kept as evidence only because she is an individual artist whose contact route is not verified yet, even though the facts show strong existing audience affinity.

never contactedCharli XCX (artist) is evidence only.

0.93
Charli XCX fans → Forever 21
0.91
Forever 21 fans → Charli XCX
Pair score0.83PITCH

Who the audience is

Forever 21 audience by age

■ over-indexes (right) · ■ under-indexes (left), relative to Qloo's baseline

Under 25+0.31
25–29+0.22
30–34+0.35
35–44+0.19
45–54-0.55
55+-0.47

Where

Cities where both audiences are strong

◎ New York◎ Los Angeles◎ Buffalo◎ Las Vegas◎ Orlando◎ Anaheim

Forever 21's strongest US cities

McAllenMiamiSan JuanOrlandoNew YorkEl PasoPonceBuffalo

Taste the two audiences share

female protagonistfriendshipfamily relationshipsbest friendfriendpop

Three more partners Qloo found for Forever 21

The pitch sells Qloo's breadth, not one deal. Affinity out = Forever 21 fans → partner; back = partner fans → Forever 21.

Bad Bunnyartist
out 0.83back 0.91

Outreach

5 found, 3 verified. Only verified contacts get a message. See the plan →

Qloo taste data (hackathon API). Aggregate audience affinity; not causal. Picked by the Qualifier and assembled by the Numbers agent with no human review.