Picked by QualifierEvidence by Numbers

The buyer

Eggie

brand · from the Eggie × Ambar Lucid thesis →

Why this side

Eggie is the chosen side to approach about Qloo audience data because it is a brand or studio that directly buys audience data, whereas Ambar Lucid is kept as evidence only because she is an individual artist whose label or management would be the actual buyer.

never contactedAmbar Lucid (artist) is evidence only.

0.90
Ambar Lucid fans → Eggie
0.93
Eggie fans → Ambar Lucid
Pair score0.88PITCH

Who the audience is

Eggie audience by age

■ over-indexes (right) · ■ under-indexes (left), relative to Qloo's baseline

Under 25+0.08
25–29+0.79
30–34-0.93
35–44-0.51
45–54-0.35
55+-0.48

Where

Cities where both audiences are strong

◎ Los Angeles◎ Long Beach◎ Anaheim◎ San Diego◎ San Francisco◎ New York

Eggie's strongest US cities

San FranciscoAnaheimHonoluluLos AngelesSan JoseSeattleOaklandSan Diego

Taste the two audiences share

friendshipfemale protagonistpoetrylovebased on novelfamily relationshipsk pop

Three more partners Qloo found for Eggie

The pitch sells Qloo's breadth, not one deal. Affinity out = Eggie fans → partner; back = partner fans → Eggie.

The Acesartist
out 0.95back 0.90
Rainsfordartist
out 0.94back 0.89
Fletcherartist
out 0.94back 0.80

Outreach

3 found, 0 verified. Only verified contacts get a message.

Qloo taste data (hackathon API). Aggregate audience affinity; not causal. Picked by the Qualifier and assembled by the Numbers agent with no human review.